Difference between revisions of "PHPCMS"

From Cibernética Americana
Line 11: Line 11:
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
<h1>2019-02-04 Update</h1>
 
<h1>2019-02-04 Update</h1>
<blockquote>Effectively, "PHP CMS" here means { Drupal, Mediawiki, WordPress }. Below is mostly 2011 or earlier.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>Effectively, "PHP CMS" here means { Drupal, Mediawiki, WordPress }. Below is mostly 2011 or earlier.</blockquote><div id="darkLayer" class="darkClass" style="display:none">
 
<h1>''cf:'' [[C-Liu]]</h1>
 
<h1>''cf:'' [[C-Liu]]</h1>
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 37: Line 37:
 
</td></tr>
 
</td></tr>
 
<tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=antiquewhite><font color=black>
 
<tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=antiquewhite><font color=black>
<blockquote>
+
<blockquote></div>
 
&sup1; &nbsp; &nbsp; I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a>,  <a href=http://surfingnosara.com>C</a></sup>.  The Typo3 site has a <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html><font color=blue>cogent graphic of the whole CMS space</font></a> and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/><font color=blue>here</font></a> is a link to a a CMS evaluation procedure.<br/>
 
&sup1; &nbsp; &nbsp; I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a>,  <a href=http://surfingnosara.com>C</a></sup>.  The Typo3 site has a <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html><font color=blue>cogent graphic of the whole CMS space</font></a> and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/><font color=blue>here</font></a> is a link to a a CMS evaluation procedure.<br/>
 
&sup2; &nbsp; &nbsp; Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is (2013-Q2) a blogging package rather than a general purpose CMS but a blog is content it or TextPattern are great for brochure sites. Joomla/Mambo and Drupal are the most popular general PHP CMSes.<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; C5 is WYSIWYG using jquery AJAX and has a decent core design. The last I counted there were at least a 100 PHP CMSes alone.<br>
 
&sup2; &nbsp; &nbsp; Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is (2013-Q2) a blogging package rather than a general purpose CMS but a blog is content it or TextPattern are great for brochure sites. Joomla/Mambo and Drupal are the most popular general PHP CMSes.<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; C5 is WYSIWYG using jquery AJAX and has a decent core design. The last I counted there were at least a 100 PHP CMSes alone.<br>

Revision as of 22:47, 4 February 2019

2019-02-04 Update

Effectively, "PHP CMS" here means { Drupal, Mediawiki, WordPress }. Below is mostly 2011 or earlier.

¹     I've used both in paid workA, B, C. The Typo3 site has a cogent graphic of the whole CMS space and here is a link to a a CMS evaluation procedure.
²     Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. WordPress is (2013-Q2) a blogging package rather than a general purpose CMS but a blog is content it or TextPattern are great for brochure sites. Joomla/Mambo and Drupal are the most popular general PHP CMSes.
      C5 is WYSIWYG using jquery AJAX and has a decent core design. The last I counted there were at least a 100 PHP CMSes alone.
³     Concrete5 and others state that they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but client work is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.
4    No reason, I can work with web packages in Java, Smalltalk, .Net, Lisp, Haskell, and Ruby, but this page oriented to the PHP market. See also Encyclopaedia Galactica.