Difference between revisions of "PHPCMS"

From Cibernética Americana
Line 6: Line 6:
 
   }  
 
   }  
 
  </script>
 
  </script>
 +
<style>
 +
.darkClass
 +
{
 +
    background-color: white;
 +
    filter:alpha(opacity=50); /* IE */
 +
    opacity: 0.5; /* Safari, Opera */
 +
    -moz-opacity:0.50; /* FireFox */
 +
    z-index: 20;
 +
    height: 100%;
 +
    width: 100%;
 +
    background-repeat:no-repeat;
 +
    background-position:center;
 +
    position:absolute;
 +
    top: 0px;
 +
    left: 0px;
 +
}
 +
</style>
 
<div style="background-color: black; width: 92%;">
 
<div style="background-color: black; width: 92%;">
 
<div style="position: relative; top: 10px; left: 35px;">
 
<div style="position: relative; top: 10px; left: 35px;">

Revision as of 22:49, 4 February 2019

2019-02-04 Update

Effectively, "PHP CMS" here means { Drupal, Mediawiki, WordPress }. Below is mostly 2011 or earlier.

¹     I've used both in paid workA, B, C. The Typo3 site has a cogent graphic of the whole CMS space and here is a link to a a CMS evaluation procedure.
²     Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. WordPress is (2013-Q2) a blogging package rather than a general purpose CMS but a blog is content it or TextPattern are great for brochure sites. Joomla/Mambo and Drupal are the most popular general PHP CMSes.
      C5 is WYSIWYG using jquery AJAX and has a decent core design. The last I counted there were at least a 100 PHP CMSes alone.
³     Concrete5 and others state that they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but client work is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.
4    No reason, I can work with web packages in Java, Smalltalk, .Net, Lisp, Haskell, and Ruby, but this page oriented to the PHP market. See also Encyclopaedia Galactica.