Difference between revisions of "Talk:UnitXP"
From Cibernética Americana
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div style="background-color: white;color: navy;"> | <div style="background-color: white;color: navy;"> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual | + | Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual. Humphrey's Personal Process was individual oriented, but it predates and is anti-thetical to Agile. <b>[[:en:Watts_Humphrey|Humphrey]]</b> was in his 70s when Agile/Extreme came out but that's not likely to have have inhibited there having been a retrofit. UnitXP is mine.I can expound on this live, nothing more to say here. [[User:Root|Root]] 03:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC) </blockquote> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 03:53, 12 May 2012
What it is
Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual. Humphrey's Personal Process was individual oriented, but it predates and is anti-thetical to Agile. Humphrey was in his 70s when Agile/Extreme came out but that's not likely to have have inhibited there having been a retrofit. UnitXP is mine.I can expound on this live, nothing more to say here. Root 03:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
秦
咷语 
戹丁语 
